International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 941

ISSN 2229-5518

REVIEW OF GAS FLARING ACTIVITIES IN NIGER DELTA AREA OF NIGERIA

1OSANG, J. E.1OBI, E. O. 2EKPO I.A., 1IGWE, O. E., 2AGBOR R.B

DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS, CROSS RIVER UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY CALABAR, NIGERIA

DEPARTMENT OF GENETICS AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF CALABAR, CALABAR

ABSTRACT

A review of Gas flaring activities in Niger Delta Area of Nigeria was carefully studied for period of 24 years. Result of the study suggest that while the people of the Niger Delta region may have benefited from oil and gas exploration, the adverse economic, environmental health, social urbanization impacts of the operations out weight the benefits. Oil and gas exploration and exploitation is one of the major reasons the atmosphere, land and sea as well as life’s and plant therein are clearly being disturb. The data for the area (70,000Km2) and population were collected from National population commission (NPC 2006) that of temperature records from 1989-20012 (Niger Delta Region) were collected from Nigeria Meteorological Agency (NIMET) data for gas production, utilization total flares, export and domestic consumption in barrels were collected from petroleum corporation (NNPC).
Base on the data, descriptive analysis, multiple bar chart, pie chart, histogram and trend analysis {analysis of variance-SPSS) was used to show the grow and decline of oil spillage in Niger Delta with a high standard error 293.567. The trend analysis shows the equation
y = 492x – 2061 and the correlation of R2 = 0.131. The bar chart in fig. 3 recorded Nigeria as
the highest in flaring of gas production among the comparism countries indicated in table 3.
The results revealed that environmental pollution due to heat radiation from gas flaring stations in the Niger-Delta area of Nigeria has been identified as one of the major causes of temperature change which lead to an increase in the effective temperature of the Earth. Advice on how Nigeria (Niger Delta will reduce gas flaring is included).

Keywords: Gas flaring, Temperature, Niger Delta, crude oil.

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 942

ISSN 2229-5518

INTRODUCTION

The Niger Delta covers a field of about 70,000 Km2 and 20,000 km2 within wetlands formed primarily by sediment deposition, which houses Nigeria’s proven gas reserves, estimated to be 120 trillion cubic feet (Onyiah, 2005). Homes of 20 million people and 40 different ethnic groups, this flood plain makes up 7.5% of Nigeria’s total land mass. It is the largest wetland and maintains the third-largest drainage in Africa. It has 5.3610N and
6.7080E.However, while the exploitation and exploration of oil has created some fortunes and
contributed positively to the economic and technological advancement of Nigeria as a whole, the accompanying socio-economic and ecological fallout remain problematic (Akpan 2009).
In Nigeria, burning off the associated gas (AG) has been illegal since 1984 and the Nigerian government has set up several deadlines to end the practice, but gas flaring continues till date. According to 2005 friends of the earth report, about 2.5 billion cubic feet of gas associated with crude oil is flared in this way everyday. This is equal to 40% of all African natural gas consumption in 2011 and represents a financial loss to Nigeria of about
2.5 billion USD. The flares have contributed large volumes of green house gases than all of sub Saharan Africa combined as well as several dangerous toxin released into the atmosphere, polluting the soil and thereby affecting the health and well being of the nearby Niger Delta communities, exposing the residents to an increased risk of premature death respiratory illnesses such as Asthora and cancers. The public considers the oil-producing companies operating in the Niger Delta companies responsible for polluting the environment by way or relentless flaring and venting of gas into the environment, heat radiation, noise radiation, oil spillage, water pollution, site clearing, deforestation and destruction of the flora and fauna and consequences disturbances of the ecosystem in the 70,000 square kilometers of
Niger Delta wetland (Ifeanyichukwu, 2001).

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 943

ISSN 2229-5518

Obi et al (2008) pointed out that the total number of incidents of oil spillage from
1976 to 2005 was 9092 in line with table 1 of Nwilo et al 2005). These is a major source of climate change which is creating increased uncertainty about the future temperature and precipitation regimes which makes investments in agriculture and other weather – dependent livelihoods inherent more risky (FAO, 2008).
Ewona et al (2012) in line with (Lohman 2006) suggested that climate is closely associated with the burning of oil, coal or gas. They also pointed out that, one important feature observed in the region is the almost complete absence of primary forests except perhaps in CrossRiverState where conservation efforts by both federal and state governments have left a stretch of rainforest. This has been attributed to climate change in part and mainly due to human activities in the other hand.
According to IPCC (2007), refer to climate changes as “change in modern climate which are 90-95% likely to have been in part caused by human action. Climate change is defined as a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which is addition to natural climate variability observed over comparable time period”. (Unite Nations Framework Convention on Climate change (UNFCCC, 1992).
Uncontrolled logging, agricultural activities, acid rain, oil exploration and exploitation, urbanization and mining activities have contributed immensely to lose of vegetation. Ewona, et al ( 2012) which is one of the major contributor to the climate change.
In line with Udo et al (1999) , Udo et al (2008) and Ewona et al (2010) emphasized that no two climate can be exactly the same. However, similar or close the two locations may be geographically. The World Health Organization advised that Nigerian government should address the problem of gas flaring by paying close attention to the activities of companies
engaged in flaring and the environmental problems associated with their exploratory methods

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 944

ISSN 2229-5518

and to invite experts from developed countries to work with Nigeria professional and environmentalist to proffer remedy (Global gas reduction initiative, 2002: world bank report,
2004). Abdukareem, et al (2012) noted that, in spite of advances in technology and the potential to convert the flared gas into a source of enormous nation revenue, the practices has continued in Nigeria, Ostensibly underscoring the problems of our national development Akpan, (2009). combustion of associated gas during flaring also releases heat into the environment. The heat radiation from gas flaring greatly affects the surrounding environment and particular crops planted within the vicinity of gas flare stations Abdulkareem and Odigure, (2002).
According to the United states Environment Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) “many scientific studies have linked breathing particulate matter to a series of significant health problems including aggravated asthma, increases in respiratory symptoms like coupling and difficult or painful breathing, chronic bronchitis, decreased lung function and premature death.“it has also accepted that exposure to benzene and its metabolities causes acute nonlymphocyticleuvemia and a variety of other blood-related disorders in humans.
Udoimuk and Udo (2002) suggested that since emphases is laid on environmental problems, the need for a major shift to a global energy system based on high level of energy efficiency world wide and rapid growing role for renewable energy is paramount. The basic sources of oil pollution at the coastal waters of the Republic of Nigeria are accidents at the extracting platforms, accidents by tankers transporting crude or refined oil pipelines. All these lead to an increase in the counter radiation which increases the average temperature of the earth.

POLLUTION

Pollution is a term that defines any environmental state or manifestation which is harmful or unpleasant to life, it can also be defined as the introduction of natural and artificial

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 945

ISSN 2229-5518

caused due to man’s failure to achieve control over the physical, chemical, or biological consequences or side effects of his scientific industrial and social habit, Drake and Hubacek, (2007). Industrial source of pollution is a result of release of hazardous waste and huge mass of unclear gases and other airborne particles produced as by-products in process industries. The degree of the increase of process industries is increasing drastically, this improvement as change man’s way of life remarkably, however the advantage derived have not being without a price which is basically the effect of pollution on the environment, Carvalho et al., (2005); Pollutants are emitted into the atmosphere as either or particles, and are eventually removed by natural self cleansing processes Ajayi, (1999), Alameddine (2009) and El-Fadel, (2005) The waste mostly originates from the burning of fossil fuels and the processing of materials by industries Abdulkareem et al., (2011). Other sources include waste from burning engines in cars, fuel use in domestic sectors, oil boom, gas flaring, agriculture processes, but of all these the process industries have been recognized as the major source of air pollutants. So much damage is being done to the environment through gas flaring, that if nothing is done in a few years from now, serious environmental and health problems such as premature death and diseases will emerge with respect to gas flaring, its effect on vegetation, health and the micro-climate are equal searing. Apart from the noise produce from the fire at the flare sites, the thick rain and eventually poison streams, lakes, lagoons and rivers thereby destroying aquatic organism and making the water unhealthy for drinking. It has been proven that gas flaring generates heat which is felt over an Average radius of 0.5 kilometres thereby causing thermal pollution (Ikelegbe, 1993). Gas flaring cause green house effect, thereby producing global warming and green house gases which include: water vapour, carbon dioxide, Methane, nitrous oxide; ozone, carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxide, Indriani, (2005);
Nwaichi and Uzabona, (2011).

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 946

ISSN 2229-5518

The fear of the known “unknown” environmental pollution has transcended natural boundaries stratospheric ozone depletion, global warming, the green house effect, deforestation, acid train and mega disaster are some of the various environmental problems associated to pollution. The potential effects of global pollution have necessitated global cooperation in other to secure and maintain a liveable global environment (Odjugo, 2010). It has been reported that pollutants emitted from one country can easily cross political boundaries. People are beginning to recognize that pollutants can affect not just a region but the entire planets. As the excess C02 rises into the atmosphere, it acts as absorptive body, which trap heat reflected from the earth surface. Scientists accept that green house effect from increased level of C02 and other heat trapping gasses eventually will cause an increase in global temperature. Some predicted that the temperature will rise significantly within the next century and that global pattern could be drastically disrupted. Air pollution is not restricted to outdoor air, although relatively little attention is given to the hazards of many substances found in indoor air most especially in the developing nations where there is no proper regulation in place to combat air pollution. But it is however well established that people may spend as much as 80-90% of their time indoor. The sources of indoor pollution are different for developing and industrialized country,Odigure and Abdulkareem, (2011). In developing countries, indoor pollution comes mainly from using biomass fuels (Wood, agricultural waste, dung etc.) for cooking and heating. The majority of the world’s population depends on biomass for most of their energy supply. It is estimated that 400-500 million people mainly in the rural area of developing countries and primarily women and children may be adversely affected by indoor pollution (FEPA Rapport, 1998). The fuel is burnt inefficiently in rooms that are poorly ventilated. Biomass smoke contains numerous substances, the most hazardous of which include suspended particulate matter, nitrogen
dioxide, carbon dioxide, and sulphur dioxide (Gwendolyn et al, 1993). It also releases a

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 947

ISSN 2229-5518

number of adehyde. While the key indoor pollutants in an industrialized countries are nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, radon (from building material), formaldehyde (from insulator, asbestos, mercury, manmade fibers etc. Also polluting the environment is the heat radiated as result of these indoor activities and process industries. The released may be harmful to plant and animal. In Nigerian context, gas flaring from the oil exploitation and exploration in the Niger-Delta area of the country has been considered as the major sources of environmental pollution. Every day in southern Nigeria, almost 2million cubic feet of natural gas is burnt (flared) during crude oil production, more than is flared anywhere else in the world (Oni and Oyewo, 2011). Hence, gas flaring is not only waste of valuable resources, but is also a major cause of environment pollution in the Niger-Delta, where most of Nigeria’s oil output is produced. Nigeria has a population of over 170 million people and an abundance of natural resources especially hydrocarbons. The Nigerian economy is largely dependent on its oil sector which supplies 95% of its foreign earnings. While the exploitation and exploration of oil has created some fortune and contributed positively to the economic and technological advancement of Nigeria as a country, the accompanying socio-economic and ecological fallouts remain problematic. The public considers the oil producing companies operating in the Niger-Delta oil fields responsible as major environmental pollutants by way of relentless flaring and venting of gas in the environment, oil spillages, site clearing, deforestation and destruction of flora and fauna, and disturbances of the ecosystem in the70,000 square kilometers Niger-Delta wetland (Oguejifor, 1993).

ACID RAIN FORMATION

Acid rain is commonly used to describe the deposition of acidic components in rain, snow, fog, dew or dry particles. (Ufarana, 2004). The primary sources are sulphur dioxide, carbon dioxide and oxide of oxides of nitrogen. A variety of industrial processes, such as the production of iron and steel, utility factories, oil producing companies are responsible for the

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 948

ISSN 2229-5518

emissions of obnoxious gases that resulted into acid rain. It has been reported that acid rain is one of the most discussed modes of environmental pollution in recent years (Odigure and Abdulkareem, 2003). Although, acid rain usually consists of relatively mild acids, they are sufficiently caustic to do great harm over time to certain natural ecosystems. Already there is much evidence that deposition of acid lead to lakes and stream acidification, stunted growth of flora while acid sensitive crops leads to lakes and stream acidification, stunted growth of flora while acid sensitive crops will die in affected areas (Abdulkareem, 2003). In cities, the corrosions of buildings and monuments are both exacerbated and accelerated (Odigure and Abdulkareem, 2004). To some extent acid rain has always been present in certain humid environment, originating from natural events as volcanic eruption, forest fires and even the
bacterial decomposition of dead organism (Odigure and Abdulkareem, 2001).

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 949

ISSN 2229-5518

TABLE 1: Stages in Niger Delta Region, Land Area and Population.


State Land Area (km2) Production

Abia 4,877 2,833,990

AkwaIbom 6,806 3,920,208

Bayelsa 11,007 1,703,358

Cross River 21,930 2,888,966

Delta 17,163 4,098,391

Edo 19,698 3,218,332

Imo 5,165 3,934,899

Ondo 15,086 3,441, 014

River States 10,378 5,185,420

Total 112,110 31,224,587

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 950

ISSN 2229-5518

TABLE 2 Analysis of oil spill in the Niger Delta

S/N

Year

No of spill

Quantity spilled

(barrels)

Quantity recovered

barrels

Net volume lost to the

environment

1

1989

228

5956

2153

3803

2

1990

166

14150.35

2785.96

11364.39

3

1991

258

108367.01

2785.96

105581.05

4

1992

378

51187.9

1476.7

49711.2

5

1993

453

8105.35

2937.08

5168.27

6

1994

495

35123.71

2335.93

32787.78

7

1995

417

63677.17

3110.02

60567.15

8

1996

158

39903.667

1183.807

38719.86

9

1997

144

29811

1128

28683

10

1998

155

43201

21202

21999

11

1999

168

62009

35018

26991

12

2000

261

49556

23323

26233

13

2001

129

51178.1

2456

48722.1

14

2002

412

25813.1

815.6

24997.5

15

2003

314

43718.01

1216.9

42501.11

16

2004

256

63191.32

2813.4

60377.92

17

2005

270

53451.61

1813.7

51637.91

18

2006

481

62125.9

3706.1

58419.8

19

2007

450

54813

3001.2

51811.8

20

2008

492

45678.03

1200.8

44477.23

21

2009

360

46012.01

2000

44012.01

22

2010

427

57813.02

2181.7

55631.32

23

2011

410

57408.56

3001.91

54406.65

24

2012

350

67891.61

3413.02

64478.59

TOTAL

7632

1140142.427

127059.787

1013082.64

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 951

ISSN 2229-5518

Descriptive Statistics

N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Statistic

Statistic

Std. Error

Statistic

No of spill

25

610.56

293.567

1467.834

Quantity spilled (barrels)

25

9.121139E4

4.3910905E4

2.1955452E5

Quantity recovered barrels

25

1.016478E4

5.1482395E3

2.5741197E4

Net volume lost to the environment

25

8.104661E4

3.9077264E4

1.9538632E5

Valid N (listwise)

25

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 952

ISSN 2229-5518


Fig i.Multiple bar chart

120000

100000

80000

60000

Quantity spilled (barrels) Quantity recovered barrels

Net volume lost of the environment

40000

20000

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 953

ISSN 2229-5518


Fig. ii. THE TREND ANAYSIS OF NUMBER OF OIL SPILL (1989-2012)

60000

50000

40000

30000

20000

Year

Production

Linear (Production )

10000

y = 492.03x - 2061.6

R² = 0.1318

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

-10000

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 954

ISSN 2229-5518

Table 3: flaring of natural gas in major producing countries

Position

Country

% gas production flared

1st

Nigeria

76.0

2nd

Librya

21.0

3rd

Saudi Arabia

20.0

4th

Iran

19.0

5th

Mexico

5.0

6th

Britain

4.3

7th

Algeria

4.0

8th

Former USSR

1.5

9th

USA

0.6

Fig.iii. PIE CHART OF GAS PRODUCTION FLARED

% gas production flared

Nigeria

Librya

Saudi Arabia

Iran Mexico Britain Algeria Former USSR USA

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 955

ISSN 2229-5518

Table 4: Data showing crude oil production, export and domestic

consumption (in Barrels) in the Niger Delta from 1989-2012

Year

Production

Export in

(barrels)

Domestic consumption (in Barrels)

1989

1715

873

842

1990

1810

807

1003

1992

1892

1200

692

1993

1981

980

1001

1994

2050

1300

750

1995

1816

906

910

1996

1993

1003

990

1997

2000

920

1032

1998

2132

1100

1156

1999

2154

998

129

2000

2129

2000

185

2001

2165

1980

1056

2002

2256

1200

568

2003

2118

1550

656

2004

2276

1620

1349

2005

2329

980

827

2006

2440

1800

1920

2007

2350

520

1680

2008

2165

980

1185

2009

2493

984

1529

2010

2274

1600

1210

2011

2293

1290

1148

2012

2234

1008

1318

TOTAL

49065

27599

23136

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 956

ISSN 2229-5518

Residuals Statistics

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

N

Predicted Value

1156.76

48966.18

4088.75

9572.201

24

Residual

-1123.618

997.237

.000

432.383

24

Std. Predicted Value

-.306

4.688

.000

1.000

24

Std. Residual

-2.483

2.204

.000

.956

24

a. Dependent Variable: PRODUCTION

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized

Coefficients

t

Sig.

Model

B

Std. Error

Beta

t

Sig.

1 (Constant) EXPORT

DOMESTIC CONSUMPTION

8.984

100.742

.089

.930

1 (Constant) EXPORT

DOMESTIC CONSUMPTION

1.036

.146

.584

7.115

.000

1 (Constant) EXPORT

DOMESTIC CONSUMPTION

.880

.173

.416

5.071

.000

a. Dependent Variable: PRODUCTION

ANOVAb

Model

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

1 Regression

Residual

Total

2.107E9

2

1.054E9

5146.071

.000a

1 Regression

Residual

Total

4299966.210

21

204760.296

1 Regression

Residual

Total

2.112E9

23

a. Predictors: (Constant), DOMESTIC CONSUMPTION, EXPORT

b. Dependent Variable: PRODUCTION

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 957

ISSN 2229-5518

Descriptive Statistics

N

Range

Mean

Std. Deviation

Statistic

Statistic

Statistic

Std. Error

Statistic

EXPORT

24

27079

2299.92

1102.668

5401.948

PRODUCTION

24

47350

4088.75

1955.910

9581.962

DOMESTIC CONSUMPTION

24

23007

1928.00

925.898

4535.956

Valid N (listwise)

24

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 958

ISSN 2229-5518

Table 5: Data showing crude oil production, export and domestic

consumption (in Barrels) in the Niger Delta from 1989-2012

Year

Production in (Barrels)

Utilization in

(barrels)

Flares

(𝑀3 )

1989

2556.67

178.59

3379.06

1990

2286.93

302.88

2878.93

1991

1594.08

472.13

1745.71

1992

1993.51

320.62

1547.42

1993

1415.14

420.62

1548.46

1994

2106.13

445.57

1660.57

1995

2406.54

602.25

1804.29

1996

2428.45

624.8

1803.65

1997

225.23

644.89

1580.34

1998

3280.5

892.02

2387.88

1999

4070.25

1021.09

3045.01

2000

10234.8

1950.48

7260.84

2001

25482.6

5508

19974.6

2002

25988.04

6081.48

19905.76

2003

27280.08

6407.1

20873.7

2004

27280.3

5483.7

21797.1

2005

28431

1572.34

25858.66

2006

57429

14353.2

43075.8

2007

60183

14820.48

45362.8

2008

57888.44

17636.2

40742

2009

27481.2

6348.1

2094.1

2010

27632.4

6279.5

2100.2

2011

26940.05

6394

2095.33

2012

27734.12

6007.62

2184.5

TOTAL

454348.46

104767.66

276706.71

Model Summary

Model

R

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

Change Statistics

Model

R

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

R Square

Change

F Change

df1

df2

S

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 959

ISSN 2229-5518


1 .971a .943 .938 4789.407 .943 174.202 2 21 . a. Predictors: (Constant), FLARES, UTILISATION
b. Dependent Variable: PRODUCTION

ANOVAs

Model

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

1 Regression

Residual

Total

7.992E9

2

3.996E9

174.202

.000a

1 Regression

Residual

Total

4.817E8

21

2.294E7

1 Regression

Residual

Total

8.474E9

23

a. Predictors: (Constant), FLARES, UTILISATION

b. Dependent Variable: PRODUCTION

Coefficients

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized

Coefficients

t

Sig.

Model

B

Std. Error

Beta

t

Sig.

1 (Constant) UTILISATION

FLARES

2618.253

1311.374

1.997

.059

1 (Constant) UTILISATION

FLARES

2.927

.357

.769

8.194

.000

1 (Constant) UTILISATION

FLARES

.307

.124

.233

2.479

.022

a. Dependent Variable: PRODUCTION

Residuals Statistics

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

N

Predicted Value

4031.13

66734.36

18931.19

18640.567

24

Residual

-8845.920

13284.076

.000

4576.436

24

Std. Predicted Value

-.799

2.564

.000

1.000

24

Std. Residual

-1.847

2.774

.000

.956

24

a. Dependent Variable: PRODUCTION

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013

ISSN 2229-5518

960

Fig. iv: histogram showing crude oil production, export and domestic consumption (in Barrels) in the Niger Delta from 1989-2012

Histogram

Dependent Variable: PRODUCTION

Mean =-2.50E-16

Std. Dev. =0.956

N=24

-2 -1 0 2 3

Regression Standardized Residual

IJSER 2013

http/lwww .qser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 961

ISSN 2229-5518

Table 6: Data showing crude oil production, export and domestic

consumption (in Barrels) in the Niger Delta from 1989-2012

Year

Maximum 0c temperature

Minimum 0c temperature s

Mean0c temperature s

1989

30.7

22.78

26.74

1990

30.84

22.97

26.9

1991

30.68

22.89

26.79

1992

31.11

22.74

26.93

1993

30.82

22.76

26.79

1994

31.33

22.95

27.14

1995

31.36

22.43

26.89

1996

30.98

22.87

26.92

1997

30.82

22.68

26.75

1998

31.7

23.25

27.48

1999

31.08

23.16

27.12

2000

31.25

22.55

26.9

2001

31.19

23.4

27.29

2002

32.16

23.21

27.31

2003

30.95

22.65

26.8

2004

31.4

22.8

27.1

2005

32.16

22.46

27.31

2006

31.53

23

27.27

2007

31.25

23.06

27.16

2008

31.3

22.88

27.09

2009

31.51

22.75

27.13

2010

31.92

22.98

27.45

2011

32.08

23.04

27.56

2012

32.12

23.16

27.64

TOATL

752.24

549.42

650.46

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 962

ISSN 2229-5518

Fig.v THE MEAN TEMPERATURE

27.8

Mean temperatures (◦C)

27.6

27.4

27.2

27

Mean0c temperature s

26.8

26.6

26.4

26.2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 963

ISSN 2229-5518

RESULT AND DISCUSSION:

The table 1. Indicates the Niger Delta Regions, land area and the population of which River state appears the largest (5,185,420). From the analysis of the oil spill in Niger Delta (table
2). The descriptive analysis indicates very high standard error of 4.39 x 104 in quantity spilled
(barrels), 5.148 x 103 in quantity recovered (barrels). Also the net volume lost to the environment indicates 3.907x104 (fig 1). Multiple bar chart on (table 2), indicates that quality spilled (barrels) over the years was highest. Fig2: trend analysis shows the equation

Y = 492x - 2061

and the correlation determination of (R2=0.131) which is low to the study.
Fig 3. ( Pie chart), indicates that Nigeria was the highest in the flaring of gas production in 2
Further, analysis was carried out using multiple regression analysis on table 4, where
Y = production
X1 = export in barrels

X2 = domestic consumption in (barrels). The model specification

y = B0 + B1X1 + B2 X2.

y = 8.984+1.036x1+0.880x2

The analysis of variance on the study indicates that there exist a significance difference on the crude oil production, export and domestic consumption (in barrels) in Niger Delta over the years of study. The residual indicates high and positive change of 0.956 (96%.). The standard error for production is very high (1955.910), std error for export (1102.165) and that of error for domestic consumption 925.898 respectively:

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 964

ISSN 2229-5518

Analysis on (table 5) indicates the model:

y = 2618.253 + 2.927x1 + 0.307x2

x1 – utilization in barrels x2 – flares (m3)

y - production.

And there existed a significance difference in the study, and a high correlation determination (R2 = 0.943). The histogram (fig iv) shows the distribution production of crude oil, while (fig. v) represent the mean temperature during the study period.

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 965

ISSN 2229-5518

SUMMARY/CONCLUSION

Environment pollution due to heat radiation from gas flaring stations in the Niger-Delta area of Nigeria has been identified as one of the major causes of strives, demonstration and sometimes- violent protest between the oil exploitation companies and habitants of Niger-Delta area of Nigeria. The result also clearly show that continuous gas flaring irrespective of the quality deposited in the immediate environment will in the long run lead to change in the physicochemical properties of environment due to the quantity of heat radiated, which influence the temperature change negatively. Gas flaring in Nigeria today possesses an environmental hazard to the nation at large. So much damage is being done to the environment through gas flaring, that if nothing is done in a few years from now, serious environmental and health problems such as lost of vegetation and diseases such as asthora, cancer, premature death, , etc will emerge. And as such lead to an increase in effective temperature of the earth. If gas flaring is not stopped or converted to a source of enormous revenue for the nation. The human race will be responsible for cooking the atmosphere to a point unbearable for man existence.

Finding solutions to these and other environmental problems isn’t always easy, and required agencies, environmental organizations, industry, Governments and the public, to work together to ensure environmental

safety . The department of Health work closely together with Government

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 966

ISSN 2229-5518

agencies, the public and other who are concerned about environmental safety have to;

(1.) Provide consultation, trainings, and presentations of schools, local health agencies, regulated parties, and others regarding a variety of environmental safety issues.

(2.) Enforce the stop of burning off the associated gas (AG) which

has been illegal since 1984.

(3.) Conduct site-specific assessments of health risks from pollutants emitted by industries, hazardous waste sites, feedlots, and other pollution sources.

(4.) Evaluate the effects of pollution on vulnerable populations,

such as children and people with respiratory diseases so that risk assessment methods are adequately protective of human health.

(5.) Develop Health-Based Rules and Guidance for environmental used for site-specific assessments and environmental permit reviews.

(6.) Track research about the health effects of envionmental

pollutants on an ongoing basis, and incorporate new methods and data into health risk assessments and best practices guidelines.

(7.) Increase more Meteorological Agencies.

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 967

ISSN 2229-5518

REFERENCES

Onyiah, I. M (2005): Modification and Verification of Milton Equation for Measuring Gaseous Pollutant Concentration. Post Graduate Diploma Thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering, FederalUniversity of Technology, Minna, Niger (Unpublished), 1-63.
Akpan, S. (2009). The Production and Utilization of Natural Gas Resources in Nigeria: A Review. Proceedings of Annual International Conference and Exhibition of the Nigerian Society of Petroleum Engineers, Abuja, Nigeria.
Igwe O. Ewona, Emmanuel O. Obi and Ferdinard A. Kamgba (2012) Prospects of Biomass Energy in Niger Delta Region of Nigeria Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology 1 (1) March 2012.
Ifeayichukwu, G. P. (2001). Modeling of Air Pollution in Industrial Cities: Case Study of Lagos, Nigeria, B.Eng. Degree Project, Department of Chemical Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Minn.Nigeria (Unpublished) 1-60.
FAO, 2008. Expert Meeting on Global Perspectives on Fuel and Food Security on Fuel and
Food Security: Technical Report, 18-20 February, Rome.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 1992.
Cemark J. E. (1985). Physical Modeling of Urban Air Pollutant Transport. Journal of Wind and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol., 59, 51-67.
Abdulakreem, A.S.&Odigure, J.O (2002). Radiative Heat Evaluation from Gas Flaring by Computer Simulation. Journal of Association for the Advancement of Modeling and Simulation in Enterprises.
Http://udim. Proquest.com/view/external costs-of-oil-and-gas-paid. Retrieved 2/22/203;
8:27pm.Nigeria: Gas Flaring in the Niger Delta and its Health Hazards. http://all
African.com/stories/200803100319.html. retrieved on 10/18/2012.
P. C. Ike and P. O. Ematiye (2012) An Assessment of the Trend and Projected Future Values of Climate Variables in Niger Delta Region, Nigeria, Asian Journal of Agriculture Sciences 4(2): 165-170, 2012.
Awosika, L. F. 1995. Impacts of Global Climate Change and Sea Level Rise on Coastal Resources and Energy Development in Nigeria. In: Umolu, J.C., (Ed.), Global Climate Change: Impact on Energy Development. DAMTECH Nigeria Ltd., Nigeria.
Iyayi, F., 2004. An Integrated Approach to Development in the Niger Delta. A Paper
Prepared for the Center for Democracy and Development (CDD).
Ewona, Igwe O. and Udo, Sunday O. Udo (2008), Trend Studies of some Meterological
Parameters in Calabar, Nigeria.

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 968

ISSN 2229-5518

P. C. Ike and P. O. Emaziye (2012) An Assessment of the Trend and Projected Future Values of Climate Variables in Niger Delta Region, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 4(2) 165-170, 2012.
Anee, J., 2004. Oil of Poverty in the Niger Delta. A Publication of the Africa. Network for Environment and Economic Justice. Retrieved from: www.fao.org/docrep/003/x8346E/x8346e02.htmp1-10.
Okecha, S.A. 2000. Pollution and conservation of Nigeria Environment Owerri Nigeria. T Afrique Int. Association, pp: 29-30.
National Population Census (NPC), 2006. Federal Republic of Nigeria, Federal Ministry of
Women and Social Development.
Jike, T.V, 2004. Environmental Degradation, Social Disequilibrum and the Dilemma of
Sustainable Development in the Niger Delta of Nigeria. J. Black Stud, 34(5): 686-701.
A. B. Udoimuk and S.O. Udo, 2000. Solar Energy as a viable pathway towards
Ecologically Sustainable Development.
B.
Akoraoda, M., 2000. Remediation Response in the Niger Delta. Paper Presented at a Seminar to Market the Anniversary of Jesse Fire Disaster, Nigeria Institute of International Affairs, Lagos.
E. O. Obi, I. O. Ewona and D. A. Obi, 2008. Forest casting of Oil spillage at the coastal waters of the republic of Nigeria. International Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences (IJNAS) vol. 3, No 2 (2008).
The Environmentalist; Gas flaring in Nigeria. http//Ecoremediation.Blogspot.com
2012/06/Gas-Flaring in Nigeria-what Retrieved 2/25/2013 6:14pm.
Carvalho, JC& De Vihema, T.M.B (2005): Pollutant Dispersion Simulation fro low Wind
Speed Condition by the ILS Method. Journal at Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 39,
6182-6288.
Baroutian, S; Mohebbi, A &Goharrizi, S.A. (2006). Measuring and Modeling Particulate Dispersion: A Case Study of Kerman Cement Plant. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. A 36, 468-474.
An introduction to climate change: Natural Resources Defense Council http://www.nrde.org/globalwarming/climatebasics.asp. Retrieved 10/7/2012 1:30pm
Gas Flaring Poisons Communities. http:www.climatelaw.org/cases/country/Nigeria/cases/case.documents. retrieved
10/11/2012.
Nigeria: Gas Flaring in the Niger Delta and it’s Health Hazards.
Http://allatrica.com/stories/200803100.319.html. retrieved 10/18/2012.

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 969

ISSN 2229-5518

Alameddine, I & El-Fadel, M (2005). Stack Emission from Desalination Plant: A Parametric
Sensitivity Analysis for Exposure Assessment. Journal of desalination, Vol. 177, 15-
29.
External cost of oil and gas exploration in Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. http://udini.proquest. com/view/external-costs-of-oil-and-gas-paid. Retrieved
1/22/2013 8:27pm.
Igwe O. Ewona and Sunday O. Udo (2008). Characteristic Pattern of Rainfall in Calabar, Nigeria – A Tropical Coastal Location Nigeria Journal of Physics 20(1) 2008.
A. S. Abdulkareem, A. S. Afolabi, J. Abdulfatai, H. Uthman and J. O. Odigure (2012) Oil Exploration and Climate Change: A Case Study of Heat Radiation from Gas Flaring in Niger Delta Area of Nigeria.
Abdulkareem, A. D., Odigure, J. O &Benege, S. (2010): Predictive Model for Pollutant Dispersion from Gas Flaring: A Case Study of Oil Producing Area in Nigeria. Journal of Energy Sources, Part A, 1004-1015. ISSN 1556-7036.
Ajayi, O. M. (1999): Impact of Gas Flaring on the Niger-Delta Area: A Case Study of Port- Harcourt. B.Eng. Degree Project, Department of Chemical Engineering, FederalUniversity of Technology, Minn.Nigeria (Unpublished) 10-26.
Abdulkareem, A. S; Idibie, C.A; Afolabi, A. S; Pienaar, H. C.vZ. &Iyuke S. E. (2010): Kinetics of Sulphonation of Polystyrene Butadiene Rubber in Sulphuric Acid Medium. Journal of International Review of Chemical Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 7, pp832-839, ISSN 2035-1755
Indriani, G (2005). Gas Flaring Reduction in the Indonesian Oil, Economic Potential of Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Projects. HamburgInstitute of International Economics, Report 253, 1-141. ISSN 0177-2253.
Nwaichi, E. O and Uzazobona, M. A. (2011). Estimation of CO2 Level due to Gas Flaring in the Niger Delta. Research Journal of Environmental Sciences, Vol. 5(6), 565-572. ISSN 1819-3412.
Nyong, A.; Adesina, F and Osman Elasha, B (2007). The Value of Indigenous Knowledge in Climate Change and Adaptation Strategies in the African Sahel. Journal of Mitigation, Adaptation and Strategic Global Change, Vol. 12, 787-789.
Odigure, J. O; Abdulkareem, A. S. and O. D. Adeniyi, O. D. (2003). Computer Simulation of
Soil Temperature due to Heat Radiation from Gas Flaring. Association for the
Advancement of Modelling and Simulation in Enterprises, Lyon France. Vol. 72.
Odigure, J. O.; Abdulkareem, A. S and Adeniyi, O. D. (2004): Mathematical Modelling and Computer Simulation of Noise Radiation by Generator. Assumption University Journal of Technology, Vol. 7(3), 111-119., ISSN 1513-0886.
Odjugo, A. O. P (2010). Regional Evidence of Climate Change in Nigeria. Journal of
Geography and Regional Planning, Vol. 3(6), 142-150. ISSN 2070-1845.

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September-2013 970

ISSN 2229-5518

Potocnik, P.; Thaler, M.; Gavekar, E; Grabec, I and Puredoz, A. (2007). Forecasting Risks of
Natural Gas Consumption in Sovenia. Journal of Energy Policy, Vol. 35, 4271-4282.
Soylu, S. (2007). Estimation of Turkish Road Transport Emission. Journal of Energy Policy, Vol. 35, 4088-4094, ISSN 0301-4215.
Ufarana, o. r (2004). Dispersion of Heat Radiation from Gas Flaring in Niger-Delta. B. Eng degree Project, Department of Chemical Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Minn. Nigeria (Unpublished), 1-85.
Uyigue, E and Agu, M. (2007). Coping with Climate Change and Environmental Degradation in the Niger Delta of Southern Nigeria. Report of Community Research and Development Centre (CREDC), Lagos, Nigeria, 1-31.

IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org