International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 6, June-2014 1394
ISSN 2229-5518
Sonia Kumari1, Sanjeet Kumar Chourasia2, M.N. Jha3, Rajni kant4,Upendra Singh5 & Pankaj Kumar6
-----------------------------x-----------------------------
Agriculture, Siderophores.
Chemical pesticides and fungicides have been is use since long period to protect the crops from diseases. Ultimate use of these chemical substances, pollute our ground water, drinking water and the environment and interfere the different ecosystem(1). Thus it seems to urgent need to think seriously about the environmental issue and find alternative means. In the current and modern agricultural trends of crops production bio-control agent are snowing promising result to protect the crops from diseases and thus it may become an important component in sustainable agriculture (2). These agents provide the protection as well as nutrients to the crop (3,4). There are many microbial genera (Table. 1) have been described as potential bio-control agent several plant diseases. Microbial pesticides (Also known as bio-pesticides) are certain type of pesticides derived from living organisms like bacteria, fungi, protozoa etc (5). For example, Bacillus thuringiensis has pesticidal effect against Lepidoptera and Coleopteran and are considered bio-pesticides.
The term biopesticide is used for all kind of biocontrol agents like microbial pesticides, microbial herbicides, while the microbes used for insect control of often called bioinsecticides and use of microbes or its secretion to kill the weeds is microbial herbicides. Microbes or its secretion used for the agent are bacteria, fungi, protozoa and viruses. Biocontrol agents have been in use to control mostly insects, pests and occasionally for weeds and diseases .
(1) Bacteria
(2) Fungi (Entomopathogenic fungi) (3) Protozoa
(4) Virus
To use bacteria as biological control agent was necessitated by an increasing number of pests and insects. Some of the bacteria which are being used as bacterial insecticides are given (7)
1. Asstt. Prof. cum jr. scientist & O/I Head, Dairy Microbiology, SGIDT, Patna, Bihar, India. Ph-+91612-2225910. E-mail:soniasinharau@yahoo.co.in
2. Research scholar, Deptt.of Microbiology, R.A.U, Pusa, Samastipur, Bihar, E-mail:sanjeetchourasia19@gmail.com.
4. Ph. D Scholar, Deptt of Food Science &Technology, SHIATS, Allahabad, India. E-mail:rajnikant.sgidt@gmail.com
5.Asstt.Prof cum jr. scientist,(Senior scale), Dairy Technology,SGIDT,Patna, Bihar, India.:Ph-+91612-2225910. E-mail: upendra12singh @gmail.com
2.1.1. Pseudomonas spp.
IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org
These suppress plant diseases owing to secretion of siderophores or antibiotics and or aggressive root
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 6, June-2014 1395
ISSN 2229-5518
colonization by organisms that displace or exclude deleterious rhizosphere microbes. Pseudomonas fluorescence is one of the most important biological central agents for many plant disease causing microbes. P. cepacia is a broad spectrum antagonist to plant pathogens through the production of various types of antibiotics such as pyrrolinitrin. Siderophores are secreted under iron limiting conditions as means to secure available iron present at low concentration in soil. The ability of certain Pseudomonads to utilize a wide range of
ferric siderophore as a source of metabolic iron,
may contribute to their competitiveness and survival in the soil. Other pseudomonads may be used as biological agents are P. maltophila, P. acidovorans and P. alcaligen
Seed inoculation with these agents is one of the most powerful methods to control the specific disease. Target disease: P. fluorescense is being applied against plant disease, leaf-roller gypsy moth locusts, berry borer of the rice and vegetable crops.
It is a spore farming, rod shaped gram positive
bacterium which produces a crystal protein as a parasporic inclusion in the vegetative cell containing the spore. The crystal protein as a protoxin which is converted into a toxin in alkaline mid-gut of insect which lead to the death of insect.
Caterpillar pests like Lepidoptera and diptera, mosquitoes like culex and anopheles,
backflies,bulworms and cockroachers are the targeted organism. These organism harm the crops like cotton, tobacco, maize, citrus plants and many vegetable crops. Some other Bacillus sp. are B. subtilis, B. sphaericus. B. popillae. B. lentimorbis are effective against several beettles B. sphaericus is effective against mosquito larvae like culex. Use of B. subtilis is effective against Macrophomina phasecolina of sesame rot, Pythium infection of tomato, Rhizoctina solani infection of tubers. Other bacteria are also encountered as biocontrol agent.
Agrobacterium radiobacter is found effective
against the Agrobacterium tumefaciens, which for the crown gall disease of dicot plants Azotobacter chroococcum is effective against Rhizoctina solani infection of tuber crops.
Beauveria species: B. bassiana and B. bronriatii are accounted for the insect killer fungus. They produced the bassianin and tanellin in vitro, and remain concentrated in the mycelium.
2.2.1. Trichoderma: Several species of Trichoderma have been successfully used to control important soil borne root pathogens viz; Fusarium spp., Pythium aphanidermatium, Rhizoctonia batalicola. R. solani and Sclerotium rolfsii. These pathogens cause damping off, root rot, collar rot and wilts in several field. Oilseeds and vegetable crops.
T. viride and T. harzianum are utilized as a promising
biocontrol agents. T. viride is also a promising biocontrol agent against sisam wilt caused by Fusarium solani f. spp. Dalbergi.
Malameba locustae and Mattesia spp. are found antagonist against insects like grass hopper, Lepidoptera, coleopteran, while mite (Hypoaspis miles) are very effective against Sciarid larva and other invertebrates.
2.4. Some insecticides
Some viruses or their products are utilized as insecticides in place of chemical insecticides. There are many viruses which proliferation and plant growth by way of encouraging the soil microflora. It increases the crop yield also. It helps in volatilization and sequestration of certain inorganic nutrients (10) . For e.g. Bacillus subtilis soubilizes the elemental phosphorus and make it available to the plant.
• These are very easy to handle and be applied to the target.
• Bio-pesticides may be used with bio-fertilizer.
• They are easy to manufacture.
• They do not harm non-targeted species.
It is expected that insect/pest are not able to develop resistance against bio-pesticides.
IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 6, June-2014 1396
ISSN 2229-5518
Biocontrol agent | Suppressed agent | Crop | Disease /Host/Remarks |
Bacteria | |||
Pseudomonas fluorescens | Phytophthora infestans | Potato | Fireblight |
Erwinia herbicola | Erwinia amylovara | Pear, apple and other rosaceous plants | |
B. subtilis | Uromyces sp. | Bean | Beanrust |
S. griseoviridis | Agrobacterium brasicicola | Cruiciferae | Damping off of crufifers |
P. fluorescens | Rhizoctotnia solani P. ultimum | Cotton | Damping off of cotton |
P. fluorescens | Pythium ultimum | Mushroom | Brown blotch of mushrooms |
A.Radiobacter | Agrobacterium tumefaciens | Several crops | Crown gall |
Bacillus thuringiensis | Heliothis and other Lepidoptera and coleopteran | - | Cotton, chickpea, maize, tomato, groundnut etc. |
Fungi | |||
Hirsutella thompsonii | Citrus mites | Citrus fruits | |
Verticillium lecanii | Aphids, white, Lies | Citrus fruit | |
Trichoderma viride | Macrophomina phaseolina | Groundnut, chickpea | |
Rhizoctonia solani | Pythium ultimum | Cotton legume | Damping off of cotton |
T. viride | F. solani | Sisam | Sisam wilt |
Viruses | |||
Nucleopoyhedrosis virus | Rice borer | Rice | Asiatic rice borer |
Nucleopoyhedrosis virus | Cotton leaf worm | Cotton | Cotton leaf worm |
Chilo Granulosis virus | Chilo infuscatellus | Sugarcane | |
Nucleopoyhedrosis virus (NPV) | Asiatic rice borer, cabbage looper | Cotton, rice cabbage | Commercially used in USA |
Granulosis viruses (GV) | Codling moth, tuber worm rice borer | Potato, rice | |
Bioherbicides | |||
Phytophthora citrophora | Milk weed | - | - |
Colletrotrichum gloecosproioides | Aeschynomene verginica | - | - |
Protozoa | - | - | - |
Malameba locustae | Grass hoper, Lepidoptera | - | - |
2.5. Bio-herbicides: Fungal pathogens are attractive and effective agent for weed control in view of their host specific(8) . Phytophthora citrophthora and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides control milk weed vine (Morreria odorate), Aesehynomene virginica respectively. Such type of weedicides need a close cooperation .
• Biological control is cheaper and less costly than other means.
• Protect the crops throughout the crop period unlike chemical pesticides.
• These are highly effective against specific plant disease.
• They do not cause toxicity to the plants.
• Practice of bio-pesticides is safer to the environment as well as person who applies them.
• They multiply easily in the soil and leave no residual problem.
• Bio-control agent eliminate pathogens from the site of infection.
IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 6, June-2014 1397
ISSN 2229-5518
• Some of the bio-pesticides like Pseudomonas sp; Bacillus subtilis etc. do not only control the disease but also enhance the root proliferation and plant growth by way of encouraging the soil microflora. It increases the crop yield also. It helps in volatilization and sequestration of certain inorganic nutrients (10) . For e.g. Bacillus subtilis soubilizes the elemental phosphorus and make it available to the plant.
• These are very easy to handle and be applied to the target.
• Bio-pesticides may be used with bio-fertilizer.
• They are easy to manufacture.
• They do not harm non-targeted species.
• It is expected that insect/pest are not able to develop resistance against bio-pesticides.
Most of the bio-pesticides are available in talc powder from , which may be utilized as follow:
(1) Seed treatment - @ 30.0g/kg inoculants containing 108 viable cells/g carrier seed is treated with the product. Wet the seed and mix with interest of products.
(2) Spraying – About 50.0gram of the product is mixed with 10.0 L: water and spray on the crop of interest.
(3) Soil treatment – About 1.5-2.0 kg of the powdery talc product of the desired
microbe (s) mixed with dried, cow dung and use it in one hectare. Application is preferred in moistened soil.
It is very difficult to select the criteria for
a potential bio-control agent that can function effectively under variable condition prevailing during the plant growth. Willson and Weishiwski have presented some criteria for an ideal antagonists for the biological control for various plant diseases. These are (a) Genetic stability (b) ability to survive in adverse and variable environmental stress (c) shows higher consistent efficacy (d) must be effective against wide range of pathogens like a variety of fruits as well as vegetables (e) strain resistant to standard fungicides (f) metabolites or end products most be stable during the storage.
our ability to understand and manage the rhizosphore. It will lead to new products with improved effectiveness.
the food chain, unlike microbial pesticides. Due to the
specific nature of microbial pesticide most experts feel that they are useful component of IPM but generally they are not as widely used as they should be. So, it is a problem of expectation. Although microbial pesticides look like a chemical pesticides but feel like biological agents. Acknowledgement: We are thankful for the constant support and encouragement of Dr.R.R.B.Singh, Director, SGIDT, Patna,Bihar (India) for writing this manuscript. Support of other faculty member are also appreciated.
References cited:
(1) White PJT. 2013.Testing two methods that relate herbivorous insects to host plants. J. Insect Sc.13:
(2) European Commission (2008) Encouraging
innovation in biopesticide development. Accessed on 20 April 2012.
(3) Desai, S. T. 1997. Chemical industry in the post independence era: a finance analysis point of view.Chemical Business, 11(1): 25 - 28.
(4) Kalra, A. and Khanuja, S. P. S. 2007. Research and Development priorities for biopesticide and biofertiliser products for sustainable agriculture in India. In. Business Potential for Agricultural Biotechnology (Teng, P. S.ed.), Asian Productivity Organisation, 96-102 .
(5) Thakore, Y. 2006. The biopesticide market for global agricultural use Industrial Biotechnology.194-208.
(6) Gupta.,S.,Dikshit,A.K.,2010.Biopesticides: an eco
friendly approach for pest control.j.Biopesticides.1:186-188.
(7) Kumar S, Chandra A, Pandey KC (2008) Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) transgenic crop: an environment friendly insect-pest management strategy. J Environ Biol 29: 641- 653.
(8) Ross MA, Lembi CA (1986) Applied weed science: Macmillan, Minneapolis.
(9) Kumar S (2012) Biopesticides: A Need for Food and Environmental Safety. J Biofertil Biopesticide
(10) .Singh A, Khare A, Singh AP (2012) Use of
vegetable oils as biopesticide in grain protection - a review. J Biofertil Biopesticide 3:114.
(11) Koundal KR, Rajendran P (2003) Plant insecticidal proteins and their potential for developing transgenics resistant to insect pests. Indian J Biotechno
IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org