The research paper published by IJSER journal is about Wireless communication 1

ISSN 2229-5518

Wireless communication

Samanvay Gupta

Abstract

Analyzing the attractive evolution of wireless communication, wireless communications has emerged as one of the largest sectors of the telecommunications, industry, evolving from a niche business in the last decade to one of the most promising areas for growth in the 21st century. This
paper includes few key points which came into existence in recent years. This paper presents vision of wireless communication, evolution of mobile communication, it future challenges, advantages and disadvantages, and security analysis.

Keywords-Mobile communication,Technical challenges, 3G and 4G, Network infrastructure, Benefits of W ireless versus W ired & wireless 2020.

Introduction

In 1895, Guglielmo Marconi opened the way for modern wireless
communications by transmitting the three-dot Morse code for the letter

„S‟ over a distance of three kilometers using electromagnetic waves.

From this beginning, wireless communications has developed into a
key element of modern society. From satellite transmission, radio and television broadcasting to the now ubiquitous mobile telephone, wireless communications has revolutionized the way societies function. Wireless operations permit services, such as long range communications, that are impossible or impractical to implement with the use of wires. The term is commonly used in the
telecommunications industry to refer to telecommunications systems (e.g. radio transmitters and receivers, remote controls, computer networks, network terminals, etc.) which use some form of energy
(e.g. radio frequency (RF),acoustic energy, etc.) to transfer information without the use of wires. Information is transferred in this manner over both short and long distances. Ever increasing demands for high data rate packet-based services and high spectral efficiency are the main driving forces for the continued evolution of wireless communications technology. Although second generation (2G) wireless communication systems (e.g., GSM, IS-95) were highly successful in the last decade, they have very limited capabilities of supporting high data rate packet - based services. As a result, third generation (3G) wireless communication systems have been developed and standardized in the late 90‟s. 3G systems are capable of offering much higher data rates than 2G systems. The minimum data rates supported in wideband
code division multiple access (W CDMA) systems in different communication environments: 144 Kbit/s for high mobility (vehicular) traffic, 384 Kbit/s for pedestrian traffic and 2 Mbit/s for indoor traffic [2]. There are three main radio interface standards proposed for 3G: WCDMA based on direct spread (DS)-CDMA with frequency division duplex (FDD), cdma2000 based on multicarrier-CDMA and TDD (time division duplex)-CDMA [3]. 3G wireless systems have already been commercially deployed in certain parts of the word (e.g., in Japan, North America).

Wireless

Wireless telecommunications is the transfer of information between
two or more points that are not physically connected. Distances can be short, such as a few meters for television remote control, or as far as
thousands or even millions of kilometers for deep-space radio communications. It encompasses various types of fixed, mobile, and portable two-way radios, cellular telephones, personal digital assistants (PDAs), and wireless networking. Other examples
of wireless technology include GPS units, Garage door openers or
garage doors, wireless computer mice, keyboards and Headset (audio), headphones, radio receivers, satellite television, broadcast television and cordless telephones.

The rise of wireless

From 1900 the near-monopoly on international communications enjoyed by the cable companies came under threat from the development of wireless radio technology. Marconi's W ireless Telegraph Company gradually developed a chain of ships using short- wave radio communications which could commercially compete with undersea cables. In 1924 Marconi succeeded in telephoning Australia using short wave radio and in the same year was given a contract by the British Post Office to set up circuits with Canada, Australia, South Africa and India (called the Post Office beam wireless service).
The 1928 Imperial W ireless & Cable Conference was convened to establish the best way to manage these two technologies and protect British interests. This led to a decision to merge the communications methods of the British Empire into one operating company, initially known as the Imperial and International Communications Ltd, and changed to Cable and W ireless Limited in 1934.

Wireless Vision

The vision of wireless communication is information exchange between
people or devices is the communication frontier of the next few decades and much of them exist in some or the other form. This vision will allow the multimedia communication from anywhere in the world using a small handled device or laptop.

Overview of the wireless fundamentals

Following four categories:

• Radio propagation,

• W ireless air interface,

• Advanced antenna systems,

• Interference effects

Block diagram for wireless communication

Wireless networks

Wireless networking (i.e. the various types of unlicensed 2.4 GHz W iFi devices) is used to meet many needs. Perhaps the most common use
is to connect laptop users who travel from location to location. Another common use is for mobile networks that connect via satellite. A wireless transmission method is a logical choice to network a LAN segment that must frequently change locations. The following situations justify the use of wireless technology:
To span a distance beyond the capabilities of typical cabling,
To provide a backup communications link in case of normal network failure,
To link portable or temporary workstations,
To overcome situations where normal cabling is difficult or financially impractical, or
To remotely connect mobile users or networks

Key history milestones [1]

IJSER © 2012 http://www.ijser.org

The research paper published by IJSER journal is about Wireless communication 2

ISSN 2229-5518

Operator Requirements on future wireless networks

The requirements on future networks were outlined by NGMN, the group of mobile operators, in [4]. These include average and cell edge
spectral efficiency, low latency, simplicity, total cost of ownership, reliability, quality-of-service and seamless interworking with existing wireless standards. For the radio air interface, a unified evaluation methodology was established in [5] which allows for an apples-to- apples comparison of different standards and concepts.

Challenges in Future Communications Systems – Wireless

Networks 2020

Wireless communication has demonstrated its importance in the past decade as a fundamental driver of economic growth, first in the form of
cellular networks and more recently for computer networks (W iFi, WiMAX). The next decade is likely to bring equally dramatic developments, driven by:

• increasing demand for bandwidth-hungry services such as HDTV and access to data files of rapidly increasing size;

• increasing rates available from fixed networks (DSL at increased

rates, 1000-base-T,
FTTH and FTTB), which users will then expect wireless to match;

• The efficiency gains available from coordinated networks of

autonomous devices and sensors, for example for security and surveillance.
The full extent of these developments cannot be predicted, but they
are sure to include:

• Converged broadband services: “triple-play” services (speech, data,

and video) at rates up to
1 Gbit/s for users in any environment, delivered by standard/system- agnostic means;

• Ubiquitous computing: distributed intelligence in a multitude of

devices operating autonomously;

• W ireless sensor networks for surveillance and environmental

sensing.
These applications pose a number of severe challenges for wireless communications:

• Increase in system bandwidth efficiency by around an order of

magnitude;

• QoS-aware networks;

• Coping with new and heterogeneous system architectures, such as

mesh networks, multi-hop networks; peer-to-peer communication and
multi-standard networks;

• Coordination of a multiplicity of autonomous devices using

heterogeneous standards; Efficient, timely transmission of very large
volumes of short messages.

Evolution of mobile communication system

Evolution of W ireless Communication has been rapid. Demands for
further development have surfaced even faster. These demands have instigated innovations. From the age of pre-cellular mobile telephone technology, referred to as 0G in some literatures, till date wireless communication has been through remarkable changes.
1G technology replaced 0G technology, 1G stands for "first
generation", refers to the first generation of wireless telecommunication
technology, more popularly known as cell phones. A set of wireless standards developed in the 1980‟s [14]. The first generation of wireless mobile communications was based on analog signaling. Analog systems, implemented in North America, were known as Analog
Mobile Phone Systems (AMPS), while systems implemented in Europe and the rest of the world was typically identified as a variation of Total
Access Communication Systems (TACS). Analog systems were primarily based on circuit-switched technology and designed for voice, not data [15]. This Phone System AMPS was a frequency modulated analog mobile radio system using frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA) with 30kHz channels occupying the 824MHz − 894MHz frequency band and a first commercial cellular system deployed until the early 1990‟s [16].
Second Generation rapid growth in the number of subscribers and the proliferation of many incompatible first generation systems were the
main reason behind the evolution towards second generation cellular systems. Second generation systems take the advantage of compression and coding techniques associated with digital technology. All the second generation systems employ digital modulation schemes. Multiple access techniques like Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) and Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) are used along with FDMA in the second generation systems.
Second generation cellular systems include:

• United States Digital Cellular (USDC) standards IS-54 and IS-136

• Global System for Mobile communications (GSM)

• Pacific Digital Cellular (PDC)

• Cdma One [17].

2G based on the two techniques, there were three primary 2G mobile
communication systems. They are TDMA (IS-136), CDMA (IS-95), and GSM [18]. TDMA (IS-136), as a completely digital system, was deployed in North America in 1993, but operated in the AMPS frequency band of 824MHz-894MHz. CDMA (IS-95) systems using Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS) are working on the 1850-
1990 MHz frequency band to support CDMA carriers. This spectrum is
commonly called Personal Communications Services (PCS). GSM is the most widely used 2G standard, accounting for about 66 percent of the world market in the year 2004 [19]. Standards were developed to provide both data service, and increase the data rate in GSM
networks. General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) was a packet overlay network designed to provide data services in a GSM network. GPRS
utilized the same frame structure as GSM, and supported a maximum data rate of 21.4kbps [20].
2.5G GPRS (General Packet Radio Service) Until the late nineteen-
nineties wireless mobile networks focused primarily on voice service, evolving from the well-known “bag telephone” in the late eighties to the newer, clearer digital networks, such as GSM. W ith the advent of smaller, more powerful devices, user sophistication has grown and
with it the demand for faster wireless data services has also grown. In an attempt to address this, the European Telecommunications
Standards Institute (ETSI) developed a new wireless data network, designed to integrate with existing digital networks, known as Gen eral Packet Radio Service or GPRS. GPRS offers speeds from 9 to 115
Kbps and support for multiple bandwidths, make it an ideal solution for carriers on the path to the 3G.

IJSER © 2012 http://www.ijser.org

The research paper published by IJSER journal is about Wireless communication 3

ISSN 2229-5518


Mobile Communication Roadmap from 1G to 4G

Migration from 2G to 3G Continues to Accelerate

~4.6B Total Wireless Subscribers~945M 3G Subscribers Today. Expected to be ~2.7B by 2014

Global Handset Demand Remains Strong across Multiple

Segments

Reason behind the growth in just 25 years

1. Relentless progress in silicon technology
(a)Higher integration, lower costs ($20 phones readily available in emerging markets), more capabilities
2. Technical advances in air interfaces
(b)Higher efficiency for voice and data services, lower infrastructure capital costs.

Network Modems: 14 Years Apart

Simplifying Phone Design


Challenge: Battery Technology

What is 4G?

4G stands for Fourth Generation Mobile Communication which

provides „anytime‟, „anywhere‟ wireless broadband services. Along with

high quality voice, high data rates 4G supports HD videos even in very high speed.

Goals of 4G

1. Improvement of Spectral Efficiency
2. Different Traffic Support e.g. Real-Time & Non-Real-Time application
3. Efficient operation with instantaneous access to network resources
4. Re-use of existing cell site infrastructure.
5. Flexible spectrum allocation
6. Lower cost per bit
7. Improved Quality of Service (QoS)
8. Increasing Coverage

Improvement in Network Side

1. Improvement in Latency, Capacity & Throughput
2. Simplified Core Network
3. Optimized IP Traffic & Services

Why 4G is needed?

IJSER © 2012 http://www.ijser.org

The research paper published by IJSER journal is about Wireless communication 4

ISSN 2229-5518


History of cellular telephony

This detail given below shows the change of telephonic generation time to time.

Physical layer

1. Proposal from Japan W -CDMA {DS-CDMA FDD/TDD, 1.25,5,10,20
MHz}
2. 3G in Europe ETSI

Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) UMTS Terrestrial Radio Access (UTRA),

a. W -CDMA

b. UTRA FDD paired bands

c. TD-CDMA UTRA TDD unpaired band
3. China W ireless Telecommunication Standard (CWTS)
a. TDD system, Time-Division Synchronous CDMA (TD-SCDMA),
b. Similar to UTRA TDD.
4. TIA (South Korea) CDMA 2000 a. IMT-2000 Multi Carrier Difference between 3G and 4G

Network Infrastructure

Network energy consumption is a major cost element for mobile operators, especially at remote sites which have to be powered by diesel generators. It is also a large contributor to CO2 emissions, which impact our environment and contribute to climate change. Mobile operators have started initiatives to reduce the energy consumption of base stations, and to use renewable energy sources such as solar and wind power. The GSMA, the global trade body for the mobile industry, has launched a “Green power for Mobile” programmer to power 118,000 new and existing off-grid base stations in developing countries with alternative energy supplies by 2012. Vodafone has pledged to reduce its global CO2 emission by 50%,
against the 2006/2007 total, by 2020. To achieve these goals, the most important measures such as switching-off air conditioning when it is
not necessary are relatively low-tech. Ones these sources of energy- waste are eliminated, innovation is necessary to improve the energy- efficiency further where signal processing will play a very important role:

Core Network

As more traffic generated by end user energy consumption by
switches, application servers, data centers and their associated cooling will continue to escalate. In order to reduce the energydemand, newer generation of servers tend to reduce the number of interfaces through software and hardware integration, adoption of more energy efficient processors as well as adding dynamic power management techniques to wake up clusters of servers only when required. Processors also employ technology such as frequency and voltage scaling and aggressive circuit gating. Blocks of cache and floating point unit may
be turned off while the server is idle and then turn on quickly when
called into action.

Macro Base Stations

Many techniques have been used to reduce energy consumption of
conventional macro base stations over the past decade. These include the use of more efficient radio frequency power amplifiers, introducing solar shielding to the equipment, utilizing natural convection cooling rather than the traditional forced cooling, elimination of the air conditioner, as well as adding intelligence to selectively switch-off radio channels and baseband circuitries during times of low traffic volume. Remote radio heads and amplifiers integrated directly into antennas
are upcoming technologies with the potential to reduce power consumption. In addition, more power efficient electronic components
have to be designed into the subsystems to enable lower power consumption. The overall system-integration of often heterogeneous systems including backhaul has to take this into account.

Micro Base Stations and Relays

The current generations of macro base stations are mostly optimized for wide area coverage. However, as we evolve to higher data rate
applications, we need much smaller cells to support the increased data rates. The flexibility of such deployment would be dependent on the power supply as well as backhaul. To solve the power supply issue,
the energy demand for these small network elements should be sufficiently low such that it can be powered by sustainable energy sources such as small solar panels. Likewise backhaul may need to be provided through a self-contained relay network using either in-band or out-of-band radio relays. This will eliminate the need to access fiber at every base station but only at locations that is either collocated with a fire drop or have access to a fiber point of presence.

Femto Base Stations

IJSER © 2012 http://www.ijser.org

The research paper published by IJSER journal is about Wireless communication 5

ISSN 2229-5518

Femto base stations exploit the proliferation of fixed DSL and cable modem deployment in urban and suburban areas to provide indoor radio coverage. Femto base stations are small, low power cellular base stations, typically designed for use in residential and business environments. It connects to the service provider via fixed broadband access. As femto base stations are deployed in indoor locations, it
does not have to circumvent high building loss. Thus, low output power is sufficient to provide adequate indoor coverage. By the nature of the
small cell structure, it can improve both network capacity and coverage. There are, however, known challenges associated with femto base station deployment that include spectrum allocation, interference handling, access control, lawful interception, emergency calls and equipment location, quality of service, handover and network integration. In addition, the requirement of access fixed broadband precludes the deployment of femto base stations in many of the emerging markets where fixed infrastructure is effectively non-existent. Smart signal processing solutions have the potential to solve some of the femto cell issues.

Off-grid locations

Providing sustainable energy source to base station infrastructure at
locations beyond the power grid is particularly challenging. Conventional methods of using diesel generations and lead-acid batteries are relatively low cost but cause high maintenance overhead and environmental impact. The industry is looking to renewable energy sources including solar and wind as the primary energy sources and regenerative fuel cell technology as a means of backup. More specifically, a fuel cell normally requires some kind of fuel, such as hydrogen, to generate electricity and provide water as a by-product. Regenerative fuel cells are designed to recycle the water output and through the use of electrolysis to extract the hydrogen. Together with oxygen from the air, and power supplied by the solar and wind, a near- closed cycle can be formed. The process is completely
environmentally friendly but the economics of such a setup has yet to be refined before it can be sufficiently attractive to compete with lower cost conventional solutions. Interworking between power supply, power storage and network equipment power demand poses a challenge with the need for innovative solutions.

Future wireless communication

This graph shows growth of mobile communication.

Advantages

Mobility - user device can be moved easily within the wireless range

Neat and easy Installation - since no cable running here and there, just start up the wireless device and you're ready to rumble
Less cost for cabling infrastructure and device

More users supported - cable device have limited slots whereas wireless does not.
Easy maintenance
Avoided ground potential rise problems
Safety due to remote operations
W armth of a van outside a freezing substation

More data and additional capabilities

Disadvantages

Relatively lower bandwidth speed - example: although currently

802.11/n could reach 128 Mbps, UTP cable can reach 1 Gbps. And
more user mean each bandwidth get smaller. That is why currently wired backbone network is still preferred.

Ease of access means more security als o necessary to protect data and/or bandwidth, since people can connect anywhere within range without seeking network plug.

Eavesdropping on data
Unauthorized control commands
Unreliable, disrupted communications in the noisy substation environment

Hackers, viruses, and worms

Benefits of Wireless versus Wired

Less expensive because cabling does not need to be installed. While fiber optic cables cost about $25k per mile, wireless media is “free”

More rapid implementation, since no trenching through and around substation equipment is required.

Less experienced technicians can often be used, because they do

not need to be concerned with ground potential rise or have to run cables around HV equipment.

More mobile and portable so that the same equipment with wireless

communications can easily be moved from one spot to another, either continuously (e.g. in a truck) or periodically (e.g. for spot maintenance).

Additional wireless equipment can automatically interconnect

with only the appropriate security features enabled.

Less susceptible to ground potential rise because no cabling is needed.

Failure location in wireless systems can be easier, since only need to test the end devices.

New wireless applications may be feasible that were not cost-

effective with wired communications. These applications might improve power system reliability and efficiency, or provide increased personnel safety.

Technical challenges

Following are the technical challenges and barriers.

A) Security and Privacy

In the development of 4G Networks, security measures must be established that enable data transmission to be as safe as possible. Specifically, “The 4G core addresses mobility, security, and QoS through reuse of existing mechanisms while still trying to work on some mobility and handover issues”. Therefore, it is necessary for the organization to develop an effective series of tools that support maximum 4G security measures as a means of protecting data that is transmitted across the network from hackers and other security violations. Because of the nature of the 4G network, there is an increased likelihood of security attacks, and therefore, multiple levels
of security, including increased requirements for authentication, will be necessary to protect data and information that is transmitted across the
network [6]. To overcome these security and privacy issues, two approaches can be followed. The first is to modify the existing security and privacy methods so that they will be applicable to heterogeneous
4G networks Another approach is to develop new dynamic reconfigurable, adaptive, and lightweight mechanisms whenever the currently utilized methods cannot be adapted to 4G networks [7].

B) Technologies for Cost Reduction

The use of higher frequency band to achieve higher transmission rate with conventional system configuration technology generally reduces
the radius of the cell that one base station can cover. To retain the original coverage area, more base stations are required and network cost is increased. To avert that problem, it is necessary to expand cell radii by means of higher performance radio transmission and circuit technology, such as improved modulation/demodulation techniques that can cope with low S/N, the use of adaptive array antennas, and low noise receivers [8].

IJSER © 2012 http://www.ijser.org

The research paper published by IJSER journal is about Wireless communication 6

ISSN 2229-5518

C) Quality of Services

What QoS does 4G provide to us they are as follows:-
(1) Traffic generated by the different services will not only increase traffic loads on the networks, but will also require different quality of service (QoS) requirements (e.g., cell loss rate, delay, and jitter) for different streams (e.g., video, voice, data).
(2) Providing QoS guarantees in 4G networks is a non-trivial issue where both QoS signaling across different networks and service
differentiation between mobile flows will have to be addressed.
(3) One of the most difficult problems that are to be solved, when it comes to IP mobility, is how to insure the constant QoS level during
the handover.
(4) Depending on whether the new access router is in the same or some other sub network, we recognize the horizontal and vertical
handover.
(5) However, the mobile terminal cannot receive IP packets while the process of handover is finished. This time is called the handover
latency.
(6) Handover latency has a great influence on the flow of multimedia applications in real-time.

D) Complex Architecture

1) Multimode End-User Terminals

To reduce operating costs, devices that operate on 4G networks
should have the capability to operate in different networks. This will not only reduce the operating cost but will also simplify design problems and will reduce power consumption. However, accessing different mobile and wireless networks simultaneously is one of the major
issues 4G networks have been addressing [9].

2) System Discovery and Selection

Due to the heterogeneity of 4G networks, wireless devices have to process signals sent from different systems, discover available services, and connect to appropriate service providers. Various service providers have their own protocols which can be incompatible with

each other as well as with the user‟s device. This issue may

complicate the process of selecting the most appropriate technology
based on the time, place and service provided, and thus, may affect the Quality of service provided to the end user. One solution to resolve this issue iscalled “System initiated discoveries”. This mechanism allows automatic download of software modules based on the wireless system the user is connected to [10].

3) Service and Billing

Managing user accounts and billing them has become much more complicated with 4G networks. This is mainly due to heterogeneity of
4G networks and the frequent interaction of service providers. The
research community addressed this concern and proposed several

frameworks to handle the customers‟ billing and user account

information [11, 12]. Security analysis A) Objectives
The first step in analyzing cellular wireless security is to identify the security objectives. These are the goals that the security policy and corresponding technology should achieve. Howard, W alker, and Wright, of the British company Vodafone, created objectives for 3G wireless that are applicable to 4G as well:

• To ensure that information generated by or relating to a user is

adequately protected against misuse or misappropriation.

• To ensure that the resources and services provided to users are

adequately protected against misuse or misappropriation.

• To ensure that the security features are compatible with world -wide availability...

• To ensure that the security features are adequately standardized to ensure world-wide interoperability and roaming between different providers.

• To ensure that the implementation of security features and mechanisms can be extended and enhanced as required by new threats and services.

• To ensure that security features enable new „e-commerce‟ services

and other advanced applications (Howard, W alker, and W right 2001,
22)

B) Threats

Because instances of 4G wireless systems currently only exist in a few laboratories, it is difficult to know exactly what security threats may be present in the future. However, one can still extrapolate based on past experience in wired network technology and wireless transmission. For instance, as mobile handheld devices become more complex, new layers of technological abstraction will be added. Thus, while lower layers may be fairly secure, software at a higher layer may introduce vulnerabilities, or vice-versa. Future cellular wireless devices will be known for their software applications, which will provide innovative new features to the user. Unfortunately, these applications will likely introduce new security holes, leading to more attacks on the
application level (Howard, W alker, and W right 2001, 22). Just as attacks over the Internet may currently take advantage of flaws in applications like Internet Explorer, so too may attacks in the future take advantage of popular applications on cellular phones. In addition, the aforementioned radio jammers may be adapted to use IP technology to masquerade as legitimate network devices [13].

Conclusion

Evolution of wireless communication in the form of mobile communication was a drastic change in the field of communication.
Current trends in the evolution of wireless data services are either in
the direction of high-speed wireless LAN‟s or low-speed wide-coverage mobile data services. The direction for the future is toward flexible multi
rate services for multimedia applications, adjusting the specifications of the service with the user requirement and the environment. There are many technical details which could not be included in this paper which help in understand the growth of wireless communication. An extensive list of references is included which will provide the reader with more detailed information on the topics covered in the paper.

References

1. EBook-the complete wireless communications professional by
William W ebb

2. F. Adachi, “Evolution towards broadband wireless systems,” The 5th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications, 2002, vol. 1, pp. 19-26, 27-30 Oct. 2002.

3. J. De Vriendt, P. Laine, C. Lerouge, and X. Xiaofeng, “Mobile network evolution: a revolution on the move,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 104-111, April 2002.

4. H. Akhavan, V. Badrinath, T. Geitner, H. Lennertz, Y. Sha, T. Utano, B. W est: “Next Generation MobileNetworks Beyond HSPA and EvDO”, NGMN Alliance W hite Paper, www.ngmn.org, 3.0, December 2006
5. G. W annemacher, A. Buldorini, S. Xiadong: “Next Generation Mobile

Networks Radio Access Networks Evaluation Methodology”, NGMN

Alliance W hitePaper, www.ngmn.org, 1.3, January 2008

[6] E. Buracchini, “The Software Radio Concept,” IEEE Commun.

Mag., 2000 vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 13843.
[7] N. Montavont and T. Noel, “Handover Management for Mobile

Nodes in IPv6 Networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag., Aug. 2002, vol. 40,

no. 8, pp. 3843.

[8] T. Miki, T. Ohya, H. Yoshino, N. Umeda, “The Overview of the 4th

Generation Mobile Communication System”, IEEE 2005. Pp. 1551-

1555.
[9] K.P. Makhecha, K.P. W andra, “4G W ireless Networks: Opportunities and Challenges”, IEEE INDICON 2009. Pp. 1-4
[10] A. Lyle, Clear, first 4G network launched, 2009.

[11] F. Ghys and A. Vaaraniemi, “Component-based Charging in a

Next generation Multimedia Network,” IEEE Commun. Mag., Jan.
2003, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 99102.

[12] S. Higgenbotham, Countdown to 4G: who‟s doing what, when,

2008.
[13] J. Ahmad, B. Garrison, J. Gruen, C. Kelly, and Hunter Pankey,

“4G W ireless Systems”, Feb. 2003.

[14] H.H. Chen, M. Guizani, W . Mohr, “Evolution toward 4G wireless

networking”, IEEE Network, 2005. Volume: 21 Issue: 1 pp. 4-5.

[15] T.D. Systems, “Third Generation (3G) W ireless”, W hite Paper Inc.

March 2000 Inc.

[16] C. Yiping, Y. Yuhang; “A new 4G architecture providing multimode terminals always best connected services”, IEEE W ireless Communications, Volume: 14 Issue: 2 pp. 36-41.

IJSER © 2012 http://www.ijser.org

The research paper published by IJSER journal is about Wireless communication 7

ISSN 2229-5518

[17] F. Alam, “Simulation of Third Generation CDMA Systems”, MSc thesis, Dept of Electrical and Eng, Polytechnic Institute & State University, 1999. Virginia.

[18] S. Frattasi, A. Gimmler, “Potentials and limits of cooperation in wireless communications: Toward 4G wireless”, IEEE Technology and

Society Magazine, 2005. Volume: 27 Issue: 1 pp. 8-12.
[19] 3GPP. Feasibility study on 3GPP system to W ireless Local Area Network (W LAN) interworking (Release 6). 3GPP, TR 22.934 V6.1.0. http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/2002-12/Rel- 6/22_series/22934-
610.zip.

[20] R, JP, “Mapping the wireless technology migration path: The

evolution to 4G systems”, Enriching Communications, Volume: 2 Issue:

1 pp. 73-79.

Samanvay Gupta

Samanvaygupta18@gmail.com

4th year 1st semester

Computer Science Department

Visvesvaraya College of Engineering & Technology

Hyderabad, Andra Pradesh, INDIA

IJSER © 2012 http://www.ijser.org

The research paper published by IJSER journal is about Wireless communication 8

ISSN 2229-5518

Residential Address: Samanvay Gupta

S/o Mr. A.C Gupta

113/185 swaroopnagar, near K.V.M College

Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh INDIA PIN-208002

IJSER © 2012 http://www.ijser.org